Showing posts with label Minister. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minister. Show all posts

Monday, May 31, 2010

Is Cabinet Minister Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - AUGUST 07:  Minister f...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Is Cabinet Minister  Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights?



A request for a cash settlement to resolve a privacy complaint against Cabinet minister Paula Bennett suggests the politician could have been at fault, a top privacy lawyer says.



John Edwards, who has been a privacy lawyer for 20 years and helped set up the Privacy Commissioner's Office in 1993, says Ms Bennett may have breached privacy rights again in disclosing details of the request.



Ms Bennett revealed the contents of a letter she received from the commissioner's office. In the letter, solo mother Natasha Fuller asked for a $15,000 cash settlement and an apology for the hurt and humiliation she had suffered.



Is Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights? Here is the latest selection of Your Views:


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, March 28, 2010

NZ Govt prepares for Foreshore and Seabed legislation and other matters...

Māori PartyImage via Wikipedia
 
Govt clears decks pre-Easter on foreshore and seabed, ECan, and CRIs . The State should own and manage all land below the highwater mark...



The government's preferred solution for resolving the foreshore and seabed issue will be issued as a discussion document before Easter, along with decisions on whether to sack the regional councillors on the board of Environment Canterbury, Prime Minister John Key said today.



Speaking after Cabinet, Key said the government would allow four weeks for consultation on the foreshore and seabed document, which follows a ministerial review last year. Legislation to fix the vexed issue remains targeted for introduction to Parliament in August.



Repeal of the previous government's 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act is part of the coalition agreement between the National and Maori parties, but exactly what form the government is proposing for resolving the issue remains unclear. Indications from Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson suggest a pan-Maori approach to resolving the issue is not favoured, and that capacity for local iwi solutions to local issues will be possible.



The Maori Party "seems happy with progress", said Key, who promised a "thoughtful" document which would offer a "credible way forward". The issue has polarised because of its perceived threat to rights of access to the foreshore for non-Maori, and Maori anger over the theft of entitlements relating to foreshore and seabed created by the previous government's legislation.



Meanwhile, Key said Cabinet had made decisions relating to the future of Environment Canterbury at Cabinet today, and these would be announced by the environment and local government ministers Nick Smith and Rodney Hide "in the next few days".







A review led by former National Cabinet Minister Wyatt Creech recommended sacking theECan councillors, replacing them with a commissioner, and the creation of a new special water authority to deal with water allocation and storage issues in the stressed catchment.



Key also announced today that the government would implement all of the key recommendations of the Crown Research Institute taskforce, including a greater proportion of non-contestable funding, and a move to more meaningful measures of Crown science contributions to national outcomes. This includes a "financial viability" test rather than a commercial return test for the CRIs' financial performance.

If the National Government cannot sort out this mess, the incoming government of the left will do it for them once and for all!  The State should own and mange all land below the highwater mark - end of story. As an immigrant people Maori are entitled to what they can settle for in the Waitangi Treaty settlement process. There will be a change to republicanism in this country and Maori would need to sort out their problems during the next few years, because the majority in this country are losing patience with minority interests.











Businesswire.co.nz




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, March 25, 2010

The Court found David Bain not guilty at his retrial - they didn't find him innocent...

Memorial to the family of David Bain, Mosgiel,...Image via Wikipedia
The David Bain saga continues.  One of New Zealand's (alleged) worst  family mass murderers was found not guilty at his retrial. It was a legal point that eventually set him free, but much of the original evidence was lost and unavailable at the retrial  His lawyer has put forward a claim  to the Ministry of Justice for compensation for illegal arrest and imprisonment, or words to that effect. This claim will be heard by the Prime Minister, the Minister of Justice  and a Cabinet committee. Is it warranted, many people will ask? He was found not guily, not innocent!

After the original trial found him guilty and sentenced him to eleven or more years imprisonment, I was one of those who sat on the fence and thought, yes he could be guilty. But later I read a number of books about the trial, David Bain and his slain familty. From thereon I was convinced of Bain's guilt, and I still believe he was and is guilty of the mass murder of his parents and siblings -  two sisters and a younger brother. I did not read his supporter, Joe Karam's books, because they were in my opinion  just biased spin doctoring.

So now it is up to John Key and his Cabinet to decide if David Bain is innocent and deserves compensation. Political consideration is not a point here - they represent the Government and the people of New Zealand. I don't envy their task.

However the souls of the slain Bain family cry out for justice. Would compensation for a freed David Bain be just?
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Telecom's XT problems not surprising under a National Government...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - AUGUST 21:  Telecom Ch...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Sunrise money panel review Telecom's reaction to XT failure.

Telecom's shares are taking a hit as the fallout over the XT failures continues.

Another head has rolled over the debacle - technology officer frank mount, responsible for the design and operation of the network, has resigned, and Telecom boss Paul Reynolds has announced a $10 million compensation package for customers.

Experts to be flown in to try and fix our third world phones. North Korea perhaps? LOL

The Government has described the network problems as embarrassing and wants an urgent report on the matter.


Communications Minister, Steven Joyce has warned he will regulate to ensure 111 calls are a priority.

But are we surprised that something like this is happening with a National Government? No, definately not!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]