Showing posts with label Christchurch City Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christchurch City Council. Show all posts

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Auckland Super City electoral police investigation into allegations of bribery on the North Shore...

View of Auckland's North Shore from the reserv...Image via Wikipedia Police have started a second Super City electoral investigation, this time into allegations of bribery on the North Shore.


The Shore Voice ticket, which includes five North Shore City councillors, is being investigated for allegedly asking voters to participate in a survey with a $15,000 prize draw.



Detective Senior Sergeant Brett Batty, of the North Shore police, yesterday said this followed a complaint to the Auckland electoral officer, Dale Ofsoske, by the Citizens & Ratepayers Association.



Police are focusing on the bribery clause in the Local Electoral Act.



This says it is an offence punishable by up to two years in jail to offer or give money to voters.



A separate police inquiry is being made into a possible voting scam in Papatoetoe, South Auckland, which could involve more than 1000 voters.



Police are concentrating on 306 names which have been removed from the roll by the Electoral Enrolment Centre, but sources said that number was the tip of the iceberg.



Last night, there were conflicting interpretations between Shore Voice leader Chris Darby and the company providing email survey work for the ticket about entering voters into a $15,000 prize draw.


Q Group head Kevin Francis said the company sent emails asking voters to register with Shore Voice.



In the next sentence, the email invited voters to click on another information link to go into a draw for $15,000.



"The act of doing that puts you in the draw," Mr Francis said.



Mr Darby, a North Shore City councillor, said the political group had never thought of treating, bribery or inducements for voters.



He said the survey copy seen and approved by the group did not include any financial inducements.



Mr Darby said C&R was trying to smear Shore Voice because its polling showed Shore Voice was rattling its Auckland City-based rival.



The other four city councillors standing for Shore Voice are Dianne Hale, former Labour MP Ann Hartley, Margaret Miles and businessman Kevin Schwass.



With 12 other candidates, the ticket is contesting the North Shore and Albany wards on the Auckland Council and the Hibiscus & Bays, Upper Harbour, Devonport-Takapuna, and Kaipatiki local boards.



C&R president John Slater, who calls Shore Voice a "Labour Party-aligned ticket", said the right-leaning group would assist the authorities.



Meanwhile, Detective Inspector Mark Gutry yesterday said police were making good progress on the possible Papatoetoe voting scam, and hoped to wrap it up before the postal election closed on October 9.



Up to 40 officers are working on the inquiry.



Mr Gutry said he expected the figure of 306 falsely enrolled voters to increase, but would not comment further.



People living in Hamilton, Tauranga and Hastings have allegedly been enrolled in the Papatoetoe subdivision of the Otara-Papatoetoe Local Board.



Electoral Enrolment Centre executive Murray Wicks said the 306 people dropped from the roll included seven from Tauranga, eight from the Western Bay of Plenty and 291 from Auckland, mostly South Auckland.



A field officer contracted to the Electoral Enrolment Centre to enrol Indian community voters has denied being involved in the alleged scam.



Harjinder Singh, editor of the Punjabi News website, was named in an official letter of complaint to Mr Ofsoske. The letter was passed on to the police.



Mr Singh said he visited Hindu and Sikh temples on Sundays to help people fill out voter forms, and handed out forms which people completed and returned in pre-paid envelopes.



He did not know how many people he had enrolled in total, but said it was sometimes up to 50 a day.



Mr Singh said he never enrolled anyone outside of Papatoetoe in the subdivision of the local board. He said police had not spoken to him.



Mr Wicks would not say if Harjinder Singh had enrolled any of the 306 removed voters.



The Weekend Herald revealed the Super City police inquiry a fortnight ago after visiting two Papatoetoe addresses where nearly 90 people were enrolled.



It is understood that Daljit Singh, one of two Labour Party candidates in the Papatoetoe subdivision, has now spoken to police.



He was trying to arrange a meeting with detectives on Thursday night, but did not return telephone calls yesterday.



Earlier in the week, police visited Daljit Singh's real estate office and took his laptop computer.



Mr Singh said he had done nothing wrong and was the victim of a politically motivated smear campaign.


Acknowledgements: Weekend Herald

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Developers built on unsafe land - Christchurch mayor claims




Developers built on unsafe land - Christchurch mayor claims...





Have you been affected by the earthquake?







Cleaning up after the Christchurch earthquake. Photo / Greg BowkerDevelopers went ahead and built on areas of land that could turn into murky soup after an earthquake, despite legal opposition from the local council, the mayor of Christchurch says.



Christchurch City Council mayor Bob Parker said for the past 30 years his council has insisted Land Information reports record if homes are built on sandy soil deposits and subject to liquefaction.



Whole streets in Christchurch have been built on sandy soil deposits. Shortly before Saturday's magnitude 7.1 quake, rains had caused the soil to take on large amounts of water. The soil was then turned to mush when the ground began to shake - this process is known as liquefaction.



"With the benefit of hindsight, you would probably have to say that the nature of the foundations were not designed to cope in the end with the type of earthquake that we had," said Mr Parker.



"In a number of cases, there are areas where council has indicated that it did not want residential development to go ahead. In a number of cases this has resulted in court cases and on some occasions the council has lost those court cases," Mr Parker said.








He said there have also been some older areas of Christchurch which have suffered liquefaction damage but were developed long before the phenomenon was known.



"But it is interesting to note that the new Deans Stand built in AMI Stadium was built on a liquefaction zone. There is not an iota of damage, settling, or shifting that has occurred in that massive structure. And the reason is that the foundations have been designed to cope with the ground situation," Mr Parker said.



He said building is possible in liquefaction areas but, like the Deans stand, the appropriate type of foundation is needed.



Mr Parker said a lot will be learned about liquefaction from the earthquake in Christchurch.



Building requirements have been changed by the council as a result of the quake.



An urgent change has been pushed through by the council requiring earthquake-damaged buildings undergoing repairs to meet a higher standard of structural safety.



In an extraordinary meeting this morning, the council resolved to adopt a new policy whereby earthquake-prone buildings will have to aim for a goal of 67 per cent of building code levels rather than the existing 33 per cent.



The new standard would bring older buildings up from about 10 per cent of the strength of a brand new building, to about 50 per cent.



The policy comes six days after Canterbury was hit by a 7.1 magnitude earthquake that caused extensive disruption and damage across the region.



"What we are trying to do is make sure buildings don't fall on people," said Christchurch City Councillor Sue Wells.



"What we have learnt through the last little while is that buildings which are strengthened to 33 per cent of (building) code will not provide the security that we are needing."



Cr Wells said the increased costs of meeting the higher building standard would depend on a case-by-case basis.



"The cost to building owners of doing repairs will be vastly less than the cost to them of losing their livelihood, of losing their building, of losing their trading. That is what is happening out there."



Mr Parker said: "It is true to say this will cost more money in some cases."



Asked if the higher standards expected could encourage building owners to demolish rather than rebuild, Cr Wells said the previous standard was not adequate.



"And no-one is going to thank us for letting building owners repair their buildings to an inadequate level of code. Nobody wants to see buildings strengthened just to fall down again."



The council could not delay this change but building owners were already seeking to lodge applications for consent to rebuild.



Mr Parker said the city had a "duty of care" to the people of the city, and the council had to react to the quake.



"It will cause some issues for some property owners. And in the months to come, some people will have to make hard decisions.



"What we will not compromise on in is the safety of our citizens. We are making a decision that will save lives in the future."