Showing posts with label Oceania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oceania. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Jeckle and Hyde Act Party of NZ

Don BrashImage via WikipediaWell Dr Jeckle has really upset our Mr Hyde. The Jeckle and Hyde Act Party of New Zealand.

Mrs Brash's little boy Don, is looking for more mud to get thrown at him.

But seriously now, Don Brash is not in Parliament and not even a member of the ACT Party of New Zealand, yet he wants to become leader?

So by the same criteria I can take over the Labour Party from Phil Goff. Yeah right!

Neither Don Brash or Rodney Hyde have the interests of Joe and Joanna Bloggs, the average Kiwi couple wth 1.5 Bloggettes on tow, at heart, just those moronic residents of the New Zealand political Right, not the right of New Zealand.

These morons would privatise everything in sight: Would sell off our schools to commercial interests, sell off our public hospitals to the private sector and put our military forces out for tender.

But the one thing they haven't discussed yet: Could Don Brash make it in Dancing with the Stars?  Don doesn't have the surplus body fat that dear old Rodney had when he set out to dance his way to fame. But you never know do you - we may have our very own Fred Astaire. Don has proven he is pretty good at usurping somebody else's partner anyway.

Just thought of something. Don Brash and Donald Trump share the same first name. Don Juan's or Mafia Dons?

Beyond the HuttRiver

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Government wants to emasculate the public service surely?

John Key, New Zealand politicianImage via Wikipedia
The NZ Government wants to emasculate the Public Service surely like they did the union movement in the 1990's?

The government is seriously rethinking the size and scope of the public service as it looks to reduce its squeeze on cash and return to surpluses in the next five years.

Finance Minister Bill English told the Institute of Public Administration New Zealand in Wellington the government has to cut back its role in the nation's economy and focus on what services it has to provide at the expense of less necessary spending.

Prime Minister John Key has already flagged spending cuts at the higher end of the Working for Families package in a bid to help contain the costs of last month's earthquake.

"This is not a time we can afford to indulge in a whole lot of 'nice-to-haves', even though, for sections of the population, they feel the loss of those services or funding streams," English said. "The government will continue to make decisions about what to stop increasing, scale back, or stop doing altogether."

New Zealand dodged a double-dip recession last year by a narrow margin, and last month's 6.3 magnitude earthquake has been called a "game-changer," forcing the government to cut all new spending initiatives, excluding health, education and justice, this year.


The International Monetary Fund is picking growth of just 1 per cent this calendar year, and the global body warned English last week to cut back on 'transfers' to the middle-classes.

English told the conference, the public sector "will be under constant pressure to deliver better services for little or no extra money," and the choke on new spending will effectively be permanent.

New Zealand's fiscal deficit is forecast to reach 9 per cent of gross domestic product as the government takes on more debt to drive Christchurch's rebuild, though it was already facing a structural deficit equal to some 5 per cent of the economy.

The government is looking at ways to integrate more agencies, and English said there will be more consolidation over the next two or three years.

That comes after the National Library and Archives New Zealand were wrapped into the Department of Internal Affairs, and the Food Safety Authority, Ministry of Fisheries and Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry were merged.

"Too many agencies in the wrong place risks diseconomies of scale, transactions costs, duplication of roles and back-office functions, and in some cases reduces the cohesion and quality of frontline services," he said. "The direction is likely to lead to fewer government agencies over time."

English said the public service has been too clunky in the past, and increasing contestability of its services will stoke its level of responsiveness and innovation to dealing with the public.

That will go hand-in-hand with the delivery of more services by non-government organisations, the private sector and iwi groups.

Back-office functions will be targeted for more cost cutting, with fewer people expected to take on more projects, he said. This comes after the government identified savings of $115 million over the next five years on joint procurement projects.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 7, 2011

Taita women earn reprieve from Housing New Zealand stupidity...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - APRIL 02:  New Zealand...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Lower Hutt women win reprieve from eviction therough the stupidity of Housing New Zealand...

Three Lower Hutt women given 24 hours to vacate their homes by Housing New Zealand on Monday have won a reprieve.

Robyn Winther, Huia Tamaka and Billy Taylor were first issued with 90-day eviction notices in March 2009.

Notices mistakenly attached to the orders described the women as partners of gang members who were facing charges of burglary or intimidation, which were later dropped.

The women claimed Housing New Zealand acted unlawfully by terminating the tenancies in the suburb of Taita and in doing so breached the Bill of Rights.

The Tenancy Tribunal upheld the eviction notices, but the women appealed to the District Court, the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which dismissed their appeal in December last year.

Earlier, bailiffs with a police escort served them with notices to leave within 24 hours or be forcibly evicted.

However, on Monday afternoon they were granted an interim injunction, pending the full hearing of their case by the Human Rights Review Tribunal.

KR says:
The women actually live in the Pomare community of North Taita a  suburb in Lower Hutt city and have only survived through the stupidity of Housing New Zealand staff. The so-called gang members were not tenants of the properties and as a consequence the women involved were not treated fairly under the 'law'. They are entitled to be protected under the Bill of Rights. That shows how stupid this government is as well. And the 'mincing'  PM John Key as well. This is the stupid sort of things being experienced in the liberal conservative regime of New Zealand.

Acknowledgements: © 2011, Radio New Zealand

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 6, 2011

John Key accused of backtracking over TPPA...

UNDP Administrator Helen Clark shaking hands w...Image via Wikipedia
John Key accused of backtracking over TPPA...

Key Backtracks, Says Foreign Firms Can Sue NZ Government Under TPPA

In November last year, Prime Minister John Key described as "far-fetched" the idea that investors could sue the New Zealand government directly in a secret international tribunal to enforce rules in the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA).

This week, US trade negotiator Barbara Wiesel said that was no longer New Zealand's position, according to TPPA critic Professor Jane Kelsey.

In response to questions about New Zealand and Australian positions during a briefing to civil society in Washington on 31st January Ms Wiesel said "New Zealand had retracted the Prime Minister's statement. It is not their position."

Under standard US terms for such agreements, investors can claim millions in compensation from governments on the grounds that new regulation has adversely affect their investment. Under a TPPA that would apply to investors from all participating countries, including our largest sources of investment, the US and Australia, Jane Kelsey said.

"In other words, the Key government is happy for pharmaceutical firms in the US, Australian banks or Singapore-based Brierley Investments to sue the New Zealand government for millions in compensation if they think new laws or policies are unfair or unreasonable or erode their profitability", said Professor Kelsey.

"We saw with the Hobbit, just a threat from a foreign investor is often enough to see a government cave. The leverage of Warners over our labour laws and taxpayer subsidies will pale into insignificance with a TPPA."

Professor Kelsey speculates on three explanations for the flip-flop.

"Either John Key did not know what his negotiators were proposing to do when he described investor-state enforcement as "far-fetched"; or he was lying to the New Zealand public; or he has buckled to pressure from the US, and possibly his own Minister and officials, to agree."

"This proposed bill of rights for foreign investors is even more frightening when government has announced assets sales and privatisation of ACC, policies which failed in the past and required the government to step back in."

"The Prime Minister needs to be upfront about the government's real position before the next round of negotiations begins in Chile on 14 February and explain why he is prepared to give foreign firms the legal power to override New Zealand's sovereignty and extract settlements of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars".

Acknowledgements: www.voxy.co.nz




Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Job cutbacks at Tertiary Education Commission in NZ described as shocking...

Association of Staff in Tertiary EducationImage via WikipediaThe number of jobs to be scrapped at the Tertiary Education Commission in New Zealand have been described as shocking by the Public Service  Association. The Government's policy is to cap public service jobs, not to slash  numbers. So what the hell is going on here?

A review carried out by private consultants Deloite,  who administer funding for tertiary education, have claimed the commission is hindered  by its structure and lack of strategic capability. It is after all a public service.

While it proposes to create 39 new jobs, it proposes to slash 80 of the existing jobs at the TEC.

The PSA national secretary, Brenda Pilott, says staff are shocked at the size of the cuts and fear their  inability to maintain the workload if the cuts go ahead, which they undoubtably will.

This may be a deliberate tactic to enable further cutbacks in future.

This Government has no credibility at all!


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Support the local rail workshops in NZ...

WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND - MAY 26:  A Kiwirail ...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeAnd just why does KiwiRail refuse to get big train building jobs done in its own workshops in NZ? Why do they emperil future jobs in NZ? Probably because the current National government told them so.

China's CNR Corp is to build 300 container flat-deck wagons to bolster Kiwirail's aging fleet. China undercut the NZ bid by 25% it is claimed. They will also provide 20 new locomotives for NZ as well.

There must be some way for the NZ workshops to become involved in the work for KiwiRail.

This narrow approach to purchasing puts hundreds of jobs at risk and threw the viability of KiwiRail workshops into doubt, according to the Council of Trade Unions.

We now have a State-owned rail operation again in New Zealand, with capable workshops and staff.

While  there needs to be the best possible value for money spent, the local industry needs to be supported or it will just end up as a run-down maintenance operation again. The two workshops in Lower Hutt and Dunedin employ 180 people each.

The Hutt workshops were also the right place to carry out another upcoming project - refurbishing the ageing Wellington electric commuter train carriages .

So support the local rail workshops in new Zealand.










Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

David Cunliffe at the NZ Open Source Awards, 2007Image via Wikipedia
David Cunliffe, Labour finance spokesman



 Ngai Tahu, Superfund  wanted to buy South Canterbury finance...







The New Zealand Superfund and Ngai Tahu were part of a consortium of investors whose bid for South Canterbury Finance was rejected last month, says opposition finance spokesman David Cunliffe.



Details of the bidders were revealed by Mr Cunliffe in Parliament today as he alleged government mismanagement of the failed finance company that he said may cost the taxpayer more than $300 million.



Mr Cunliffe told the House an offer for $1.3 billion was made on August 31 by a consortium led by Permanent Investments. That offer was rejected by the receivers. Another offer again led by Permanent but also including the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and Ngai Tahu was made on September 13 and also rejected.



Permanent Investments is a company asssociated with Sydney-based businessman Duncan Saville. Its directors include Dugald Morrison, the brother of Wellington businessman and Saville associate Lloyd Morrison, who in turn has interests in companies that manage millions of NZ Super Fund cash.



Permanent was indentified by the Herald as a bidder for South Canterbury's assets after South Canterbury chief executive Sandy Maier was seen on a plane reading a sale and purchase agreement for his company the day it went into receivership.



Mr Cunliffe said based on South Canterbury's book value of $1.8 billion, the taxpayer would have incurred a loss of about $500 million had the first offer been accepted.



He also said with the Government indicating it anticipated an eventual loss of $800 million on South Canterbury, it had effectively left $300 million on the table by rejecting the offer. Mr Cunliffe later said there was a risk the value of the company's assets may deteriorate further, deepening the taxpayers' loss.



Responding to Mr Cunliffe, Finance Minister Bill English said he didn't want to comment on commercial details of bids or transactions that may still be under negotiation and he referred to an earlier statement that at no point was there any offer on the table "that did not involve considerable risk and cost to the Crown".



South Canterbury Finance went into receivership at the end of August triggering a $1.7 Government payout to investors. including $1.6 billion under the Crown's Retail Deposit Guarantee.



Treasury is to publish documents relating to the guarantee and South Canterbury Finance this week.


Acknowledgements: Adam Bennett

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Jeckyl and Hide - Rodney and Heather...


Jeckyl and Hide - Rodney and Heather...


ACT MP Heather Roy has defied her leader Rodney Hide and returned to Parliament against his orders.



She was supposed to be off for two weeks considering her future after losing the deputy leadership, but she has returned early, saying she supports Mr Hide and wants to put the events of last week behind her.



Following her very public demotion, she now also gets to sit behind him in Parliament.



"Eighty-six thousand New Zealanders voted for a list that I was high up on, and I have a duty to come back and do my job," says Ms Roy, "and I'm looking forward to it. I'm back."



But there was no display of unity like last week. She faced the media alone while Mr Hide avoided reporters following an appearance in the House.



That could be because he wasn't expecting her back.



"I've let Heather have a break… We said a couple weeks, but we'll se how we go," said Mr Hide.



Regardless, Ms Roy says she wants to move on from the accusations in a leaked dossier in which she described Mr Hide as a bully.



The memo was leaked by her adviser Simon Ewing-Jarvie who has lost his job.



"I was horrified, mortified and extremely angry at him," says Ms Roy. "There was no way I would condone the leaking of documents under any circumstances and I've told him that."



Returning early is an act of defiance from Ms Roy - the party is more divided than ever.



Mr Hide is now talking to her through the media, just releasing a statement which calls on her to front up to the party's other MPs and board to explain the developments of last week.



Acknowledgements: 3 News




Friday, August 20, 2010

Search for missing Kiwi four year old continues - whats the Key govt. doing to help?


 






Search for missing Kiwi four year old in Gisborne continues - the modern little boy lost...









Search for missing Kiwi four year old continues...







A young four year old boy, Lucas Ward, who apparently wandered away from his grandmother's home in Kaiti, Gisborne, on New Zealand's east coast, still hasn't been found after four days. his bike has been found close to the river.







Police divers have been searching in the local river for the youngster, described as a little extrovert who may have just been a little boy exploring new territory, or had tried to walk home to his father's home.







His extended family has been assisting the search and are now becoming deeply concerned for their young family member, a little blonde headed Lucas Ward. Prayers are now being said for the youngster. The changeable springtime weather making conditions wet and cold. The little boy was dressed in sweat shirt and track pants - hardly suitable in the conditions.





Some of you readers who are old enough will remember the search in the north American wilderness many decades ago for the 'little boy lost', and later the song written about him. I have a grandson the same age as Lucas Ward, and my heart goes out to his parents, grandparents and extended family whose hearts are now breaking. So many thanks to the Gisborne community who are assisting the police and family in the search for Lucas. I hope they find the little boy alive!


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The economy, housing, jobs and a clueless PM John Key and his rusty lock administration...

Unemployed people in front of a workhouse in L...Image via WikipediaThe  economy, housing, jobs - and a clueless PM John Key and his rusty lock administration...


My guest this week:  Frank Macskasy


In the last seven days a triple-conjunction of political portents has publicly demonstrated just how bankrupt of imagination and policy this current government truly is. The lack of direction and paucity of creative ideas is breath-taking. A “caretaker-government” would be a polite euphemism in this context.



JOBLESS



Unemployment rose 19,000 during the June quarter to 159,000 – a rise from 6% to 6.8%. There are over quarter of a million jobless Kiwis (the unemployed plus those who have given up actively looking for a job) and another 100,000 who want more hours than they can get. The effects of the Recession are still being felt, and is taking its toll amongst workers and their families.



Social Welfare Minister Paula Bennett’s response?



”No-one wants to see a jump in unemployment. And I think that we have got to put it in perspective – where it’s 7.1 per cent in December last year and now it’s 6.8…We’d sort of see it as an evening out now.”



This government’s response thus far to our growing unemployment? That would be… the cycleway.



Total number employed under this project: a staggering… 70.



Instead of addressing this worsening situation, this government has spent tax dollars on a “working group”, led by former Commerce Commission head Paula Rebstock.



It’s conclusion? “Most people on a benefit have little or no focus on paid work, with a growing number “locked into” the system for years. ” And, according to Ms Rebstock, “we have concluded the current benefit system ignores the importance of paid work to the well-being of New Zealanders,”



When in doubt; when there’s nowhere left to turn; and when embarrassed by lengthening dole queues – reset National Government Default Setting #1: blame it on the “dole bludging beneficiaries and solo-mums”.



In the last twenty years, National has found iself taking office during two full-blown recessions; 1990 and 2008. Their knee-jerk reaction on both occasions was/is attack the beneficiaries. (Most of us remember the cruelty of Ruth Richardson’s “Mother of all budgets”.) True to form, this government attacks those New Zealanders who – until a couple of years ago – were employed in enterprises from Kaitaia to Bluff; earning money to feed their families; and not foreseeing that, because of events in Wall Street, they would soon be losing their jobs. I struggle to understand how workers in New Zealand were able to effect the collapse of Lehmann Bros on September 15, 2008, thereby sparking the worst recession since the Depression of the 1930s. And by causing that Recession, destroying their own jobs in some Lemming-like pursuit of a dole-funded Nirvana.



The Rebstock report is not a re-analysis of how social welfare works in this country. Instead it is little more than a none-too-subtle attempt at blaming beneficiaries for this current government’s laziness and ineptitude in addressing increasing growing numbers of unemployed.



Remember that prior to the Recession, our unemployment rate was a mere 3.9%. And while no one is blaming National for the Recession that nearly doubled that figure over two years – they are responsible for their abysmal response to it.



Remember: we have 357,000 people who are looking for work.



This government is sitting on it’s collective, well-padded backside; on equally well-padded ministerial seats; fiddling with dubious reports whilst our economy burns to the ground.



Which brings us to…



HOMELESS



Yet another government quango, established by Housing Minister Phil Heatley, has complained that “22,000, or 32 per cent of Housing New Zealand tenants, had been in the same state houses for at least 10 years.” They were evidently portrayed as taking up room – room required by just over 10,000 people on Housing NZ’s waiting lists;



Current Housing NZ waiting list:



As at 31 July 2010 there were 10,153 people on the waiting list. Of this:



* 334 were A priority (severe housing need)

* 4,160 were B priority (significant housing need)

* 3,093 were C priority (moderate housing need)

* 2,566 were D priority (lower level housing need)



Ten thousand-plus people on a waiting list. What does the government do? What policy does it embark on? The following is a multi-choice option:



A. Build more houses?



B. Criticise New Zealanders for daring to live long-term in their homes?



It is with considerable unease that I note that Housing Minister Phil Heatley (who has his accommodation paid for by the taxpayer) said, “We want to ensure this significant asset is utilised to the best effect. We also want the system to be fairer and to work better for those families most in need.”



This government’s idea of “fairness” seems predicated on the suggestion that one family is booted out, to allow another to take up residence.



By no stretch of the imagination can such a policy be even remotely seen as imaginative or creative. Or fair.



It is an undeniable fact that there are many families in dire need of decent, affordable, accommodation. But rather than evicting families, and uprooting them from their communities (which in itself would create even more dire social problems), it strikes me that this government has alternatives it has not bothered to consider…



CLUELESS



Fact #1: we have 255,000 jobless fellow New Zealanders, looking for work and a further 100,000 needing more work.



Fact #2: we require several thousand new NZ Housing units (commonly referred to as “homes”) for people in need.



Fact #3: the economic recovery has been uneven, and has mainly benefited exports such as dairying and unprocessed logs. The rest of the economy has not picked up – evidenced by the sharp rise in unemployment. Indeed, ANZ New Zealand chief executive officer Jenny Fagg said that “the New Zealand economy has stabilised in a number of areas although the recovery is somewhat uneven at this early stage. There are signs of a lift in business conditions although growth remains subdued.”



Taken in conjunction, the three facts above would seem to point to an obvious conclusion. The answer is not to bash beneficiaries for daring to accept tax-payer support in feeding themselves and their families. The answer is not to evict families from their state homes. Nor is the answer to guilt-trip solo-mothers or those with disabilities who haven’t a hope in hell in competing with 159,000 other unemployed people to scramble for non-existent jobs.



The answer is to utilise the resources we have and by doing so, give people the opportunity to find work.



In case I need to spell it out to this clueless government: build more bloody houses!



The flow-on effects of a crash building-programme to build five thousand new state houses would create thousands of new jobs – not just 70. There would be a demand for architects; builders; electricians; plasterers; roofers; drainlayers; glaziers; tilers; apprentices; and other tradespeople; raw materials purchased from building retailers; additional staff at each retail outlet; transport operators; increased demand from the timber industry, creating new jobs in forestry; and support businesses every step of the way. Each tradesperson; truckie; forestry worker would take home a wage. That wage would be spent at local supermarkets, which would then have to hire one or two extra staff-members as well as purchase more stock. Even the companies that rent out jumbo-bins to cart away the detritus from building sites would find their turn-over increasing. Or the local pie-shop that would sell food to nearby building-sites. That is what flow-on is.



The government would recoup much of the outlay for the building programme by way of GST, PAYE, ACC, and provisional tax receipts; rent collected from the new homes; and less spent on unemployment benefits.



This is the sort of bold initiative we require from a government with any claim to having a vision.



Instead, we are seeing a cruel bullying and calculated persecution of those at the bottom of the heap.



If this is the best that National can offer us, then it is simply not good enough. We deserve better than a caretaker government.



Acknowledgements:  Frank Macskasy


http://peter-petterson.blogspot.com/    DOWN BY THE HUTTRIVER

http://anzacbloggersunite.blog.co.uk/   ANZAC BLOGGERS UNITE


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Leave the SAS and other special forces in Afghanistan to deal with Taliban prisoners......

New Zealand Green Politician Keith Locke campa...Image via Wikipedia
Torture claims lead to call for withdrawal of the NZ SAS...




Green MP Keith Locke says NZ soldiers should withdraw from Afghanistan after claims SAS has handed prisoners over to possible torture



There's a call for the Government to reconsider our involvement in Afghanistan, following claims the SAS has handed prisoners over to possible torture.



Green MP Keith Locke says New Zealand soldiers have been helping catch insurgents who are passed to the Afghan secret police. That is despite the British military being banned from handing prisoners over due to the risk they will be subjected to torture or serious mistreatment.



Mr Locke says the revelations strengthen the Green Party's case for withdrawal of our SAS unit from Afghanistan. He says he does not want New Zealand's good name muddied by links to the torture of prisoners, which is believed to include beatings, electric shock treatment and sleep, food and water deprivation.


Is he discussing the possible mistreatment of the Taliban prisoners?  The 12th century homosexual  philosophers of the total hatred and mistreatment of women - women are just for breeding and sexual enjoyment is gained with young men.  If women disobey men they may be disciplined by men ie cutting off their ears and noses if they leave their bestial husband

Leave SAS and other special forces troops with special methods in dealing with these bastartds right  there!





Acknowledgements:© 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

NZ public private partnerships policy doubts

Massey University logoImage via Wikipedia






Govt's public private partnership policy  doubts...


A lack of analysts and suppliers are fuelling doubts surrounding the need for public private partnerships



Public projects worth more than $25 million have to consider the option of a public private partnership, but there are doubts surrounding the need for them in New Zealand.



Massey University public policy director Stuart Birkes says New Zealand may not have enough analysts and suppliers to make it worthwhile. He says it's unlikely there will so be much competition as we are such a small country.


Pushing the proverbial uphill, some claim!


National Government credibilty  beginning to peel off.


What next John key?










Thursday, May 20, 2010

Plea for a blogger to be arrested. Just the blogger...

Law & Order: Special Victims UnitImage via Wikipedia
Law & Order: Special Victims UnitImage via Wikipedia





Plea for blogger to be arrested. Just the blogger?



A Wellington lawyer wants a blogger who has breached the name suppression of his client to be arrested for being in contempt.



A Wellington lawyer is calling for an Auckland blogger to be arrested after intentionally breaking name suppression.



The blogger has published the name of a high-profile Wellingtonian currently on trial for assault on a teenager, relating to an incident in central Wellington in August 2008.



The man's lawyer Mike Antunovic has raised his concern about the publication in the Wellington District Court. He asked the judge to consider issuing a warrant for the arrest of the blogger for being in contempt of court.



Meanwhile the wife of the high-profile Wellingtonian has given evidence at his trial. The Crown claims the accused hit the teenager after he had run away and stolen money.



The man's wife has told a jury at the Wellington District Court he had to manhandle and drag the teenager back to the car. She says the events leading up to the incident had been stressful and upsetting.



The trial is expected to continue into next week.


So its alright to beat up drag back, and detain an alleged thief in your car? I thought assault was assault was assault? Is this how things are done in the wonderful new world of John Key and his Nationl administration. Thank Christ I don't have too many years to live in this bullshit world. If somebody steals from you use your cell phone and call the police you bloody dickhead.


Good on the blogger in question for naming names!








Acknowledgements: © 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB




Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Today is budget day in New Zealand

Assorted international currency notes.Image via Wikipedia
Today is budget day in New Zealand...



Today is budget day in New Zealand. An increase in GST from 12.5% to 15% and a reduction in company and income tax. But what will it mean to Kiwis and their families? Will the tax cuts compensate for the increase in GST? Still no exemptions there though.



We will learn about the benefits, if any, over the next few hours, days and weeks. We will find out in due course as the experts dissect the budget and discuss just what it really means. Benefits for the rich the opposition party has already claimed. But it doesn't look like a Robin Hood budget to me though.  The tax increases on cigarettes of about 30% over 18 months will hurt the poor more than John Key's supporters.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Give the train work to New Zealand railway workshops...

The Hillside Workshops stretch for over 500 me...Image via Wikipedia




We'd love to see New Zealanders make the trains we need for Auckland's new electric rail system. It would create hundreds of jobs in Dunedin and Lower Hutt, improve our balance of payments by $114 million, and make our economy more resilient.



We should at least bid for the job, but John Key's Government doesn't have much faith in our manufacturing abilities. I've talked to the men and women from the Hillside workshop and know we have the skills and the ambition.



You can drop a line to the Transport Minister and ask him to have a bit of faith. Let's have a go and at least encourage KiwiRail to tender for the work.



The Green Party

http://www.greens.org.nz/


All Kiwis would support this if the workshops have the facilities and expertise. Why Not? If it creates jobs for Kiwis here, it has to be a great thing for New Zealand. But no, National wants their ideological mates overseas to get the work and make profits out of us here. I support the Green Party totally in this matter! It would create jobs in Lower Hutt and Dunedin; two areas which have suffered economically and from unemployment in recent years.












Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, May 3, 2010

But the bad news is...Key came home...

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via Wikipedia
So New Zealand Prime Minister John Key made a secret flying visit to meet the Kiwi SAS contingent in Afghanistan. He says he sent them, so should visit them. Big deal!

But the bad news is...Key came home!

Key with his stupid boyish  grin, has long lost any credibility, as has his rightwing government. They still top the polls. But NZ has a high marijuana usage anyway; so its not really surprising.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Foreshore and Seabed attitudes hardening. Really?...

Māori PartyImage via Wikipedia





Foreshore and Seabed attitudes hardening.  Really?


"Hone Harawira, Maori Party MP, says proposed customary rights which are determined by Crown are hardly what Maori want.



Maori attitudes towards the Government's foreshore and seabed proposals may be hardening if feedback given to Maori Party MP Hone Harawira is anything to go by.



The major elements of proposals being discussed include vesting the zone as a public domain and allowing Maori to go through the courts to establish customary title.



Last month Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples spoke positively about how customary title could work for and potentially be accepted by, iwi.



"If they get customary title basically, they've got the run of the roost over all decision of occupations and control over the beach."



However, MP Hone Harawira, says Maori he has spoken to makes it clear that Maori want property title resolved in the final legislation.



"As long as those customary rights can be determined by the Crown and extinguished by the Crown, then they are hardly the customary rights that Maori want anywhere in the country."



Consultation on the foreshore and seabed proposals is due to finish at the end of this month."



KR's Opinion:





The question that should be asked is: Which Maori attitudes are hardening?  Nobody should own land below the high water mark. The majority of Maori live away from their home maraes and wouldn't be regularly involved in their affairs. It is the Maori Party, which has a minority of the total Maori vote, that is pushing the Foreshore and Seabed Act change. Maori do not have the legal right to ownership of the F&S. Maori are not indigenous to New Zealand; they are the first immigrants to this country. Maori are entitled to continued customary usage and perhaps a role as guardian and caretaker of the lands therein. Non-Maori are also legally entitled to access to the beaches and coasts that they have enjoyed since 1840 as well.

It is the State not the so-called Crown,  that should own and mange the Foreshore and Seabed. The public domain is a legally wishy washy sort of title for the land below the high water mark in my opinion.







Acknowledgements: © 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]