Friday, October 14, 2011

Young voters appear ignorant - suits the National government...

A pro-MMP poster from the 1993 referendum camp...Image via Wikipedia

Lack of knowledge surprises MMP supporters

A "surprising" number of young voters did not know there was an alternative to MMP, say supporters of the voting system.


About half a dozen MMP supporters were in The Square in Palmerston North yesterday handing out leaflets and talking to passers-by about MMP.

Campaign organisers John Shennon and Lawrence O'Halloran said they had been surprised by the number of young voters who were not aware that there were other voting systems besides MMP. Mr O'Halloran said many young people were not interested in politics.

Some had not even been born in the early 1990s when the referendums to introduce MMP were held.
The pair said the response to MMP had largely been positive.

"I am yet to come across anyone who is vehemently opposed," Mr Shennon said.

Some people had "nagging issues" about MMP such as the thresholds required for a party to enter Parliament, he said.


But Mr Shennon said MMP would be reviewed if it came out of this year's referendum as voters' preferred option.


Keep MMP planned similar rallies for the next couple of weeks, it had been invited to speak to several organisations and it had paid for an advertisement on a city bus, which should be ready by the weekend.

There will be two questions asked at the referendum held in conjunction with this year's general election on November 26.

The first asks whether voters want to keep MMP or change to another voting system.

The second presents four systems for voters to choose from. They are the first-past-the-post, preferential voting, single transferable vote and supplementary member systems.

This week, the Electoral Commission began its information campaign about the referendum, with brochures mailed to every household in New Zealand.


Chief electoral officer Robert Peden said a series of advertisements had been designed to help voters understand what the referendum was about and where they could get more information.

"The Electoral Commission wants to help voters feel confident they are able to make an informed choice when they go to vote in the referendum," he said.

Acknowledgements:  - Manawatu Standard
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 10, 2011

John Key has misled the public of New Zealand...

John Key, New Zealand politicianImage via Wikipedia

The rise and fall of John Key...
The PM, John key, refuses to name the person he alleges claimed that Standard and Poors said it was more likely to downgrade New Zealand if Labour  won power at the coming elections.

Standard and Poors has publicly denied saying that. Phil Goff claims the statement was a breach of privilege. Because any privilege claim couldn't be made until after the elections, it is really immaterial. I think PM John Key knew that when he made the false claim!

All voters can really do is consider whether they have any future faith in a person who appears to have misled the country. Should the voting public vote for Pinnochio?

http://www.scoop.co.nz/multimedia/tv/business/57462.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 7, 2011

National Government to force Christchurch asset sales...

The Bricks was the first settlement in Christc...Image via Wikipedia
]

National to force Christchurch City Council to privatise local assets - local MP Brendan Burns  says...

 Voxy News Engine

Brendon Burns
Brendon Burns
Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee must front up and confirm the Government's plans to install commissioners in the Christchurch City Council and sell its assets, says Christchurch Central MP Brendon Burns.
"In Parliament today, I asked Gerry Brownlee to confirm the Government's timeframe for action given he told The Press last month that he had no plans to move against the council "at this time". He refused to say what he will do.

"So rather than use the opportunity to refute the growing view that he will move swiftly against the council, Gerry Brownlee has added to the concerns.

"Mr Brownlee might play cute in Parliament and deny any responsibility for the next Government or the Christchurch City Council but the intent is there for all Cantabrians to see - a returned National government will bulldoze through the sale of Orion, Christchurch airport, Port Lyttelton and other council assets, just like our state power companies."

Further proof of National's plan can be found in the fact Finance Minister Bill English has confirmed the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act gives the Government the power to force the sale of Christchurch City Council's $2 billion worth of assets, said Brendon Burns.

"That fact was revealed in the report of the Finance and Expenditure Committee after I questioned Mr English when he appeared on Budget estimates. The report confirms the Government is talking to the council about how it will pay its share of earthquake recovery. While Mr English said asset sales were up to the council, the legislation clearly gives Government the power to sell them."

Brendon Burns tabled research he commissioned from the Parliamentary Library today showing the Orion lines company alone, mostly owned by Christchurch city, has returned around $980m to ratepayers since 1993, or about $1m a week.

"We must not lose our valuable assets and the dividends they return to the community.
"National has already shown its contempt for democracy and the management of important Canterbury assets by taking out ECAN to facilitate the flow of water to vested interests. Clearly Christchurch City Council is next on its list," said Brendon Burns
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

John Key's real persona comes through after parliamentary jump attempt.

John Key at his victory speech at SKYCITY, Auc...Image via Wikipedia
Health Sector|Employment Figures |Tobacc

John Key's real persona comes through after parliamentary jump attempt. You can't hide the snake all the time, can you?



 Yesterday's balcony jumping incident was a really sober reminder that there are desperate people in our society. Desperate people who are poor and have been possibly shafted by Work and Income and other state agencies. However, the vast majority of those impacted by bad decisionmaking would never contemplate such acts.

But for John Key to insinuate that this incident was arranged by Labour is a real low, even for him. I heard the commotion while working at my desk and listening to Parliament on radio yesterday. I must admit that my heart rate picked up a bit when the incident occurred. Although I couldn't obviously see it, I thought that something awful was happening due to the distressed calls of some MPs in the chamber. I guessed at the time that a protester might have breached House security and made it onto the floor. I thought this given the exchanges between Opposition MPs and the Government benches after the PM shouted "You should be ashamed of yourselves", and "That's down to you." Apart from being very un-parliamentary remarks (as MPs stating you in the Chamber brings the Speaker into the debate), Key accused Labour of engineering this incident.

Yesterday, the media (through covering this incident) publicised more than they usually do the nasty side of the PM's character. This doesn't come out in the numerous public photo opportunities or media conferences that he engages in. During these times, we see the smiling, laughing, confident, friendly face of Key. No Muldoon or even Helen Clark like instincts to coldness on show. Key simply follows the Crosby-Textor rule book: don't make nasty, insensitive comments in public
.
Of course, this doesn't apply to Key's behaviour in Parliament which most of the public don't follow. It seems that the media doesn't broadcast some of the cheap comments that the PM tosses at left wing opposition parties during question time. I have seen Facebook postings from Labour and Green MPs which criticise the PM's often arrogant behaviour in the House. The PM thinks he can get away with it as the news bulletins will only dutifully carry his excited statements extolling government policy. Even before this week's incident, Key overreached himself in the House when talking about the government's supposed economic successes prior to last week's credit ratings downgrade (see earlier blog).

Away from the cameras, though, Key has often been reported to be a lot colder than the warm, fuzzy public persona he projects. I remember Sue Bradford saying a year or so ago that a participant at a meeting between Key and church leaders related as to how he and other participants had been astounded by the PM's response to a question about how he felt about the prospect of families starving if welfare benefits were cut due to non-compliance with proposed receipt requirements. Upon receiving the report of the Alternative Welfare Working Group (of which Bradford had been a member), Key dismissively remarked "I don't believe anyone will starve."

While (sadly) much of the public appears to be supportive of National's welfare reform proposals, I believe that in about a year or so, he will be vastly more unpopular on a whole host of issues. So, as the pressure builds on his re-elected government over stalling economic growth, problems around the Christchurch rebuild, and state asset sales, you will begin to see the real John Key emerge. The man who didn't cry even at his mother's funeral. The smiling assassin that even some former fellow Merrill Lynch employees remember well.

This leads to a major question - how much of the Key persona has been manufactured and how much is natural?

I think that once New Zealanders re-elect Key next month, they will get a very rude shock! Mark my words! To paraphrase Lenin's famous phrase, Key may smile but he does (definitely) have teeth!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 3, 2011

Mana Party says NZ sick of Nats and Labour arguing over crime

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - APRIL 30:  Annette Syk...Image by Getty Images via @daylife

 

MANA says NZ sick of National and Labour squabbling over Crime

MANA justice spokesperson Annette Sykes believes New Zealanders want a real debate over our appalling imprisonment rates now the crime statistics have reportedly dropped to their lowest in 25 years.


"Even when the stats show crime is low, National and Labour are still squabbling over who has thrown more New Zealanders into prison longer rather than as what is occurring in other jurisdictions like the United Kingdom questioning the efficacy of privatisation of prisons and the burden to the State and communities this burgeoning industry is costing us all.

“ We know that while that debate is focused on in the media it is Maori who are impacted upon the most due to the systemic discriminatory practices right from the moment of questioning, through charging and representation to sentencing that they confront daily.”

“In light of the incredibly low crime rate, MANA says we need to review the obnoxious private prison cancer this Government has released.


“The time is now to drag us away from corporate profits for imprisonment and focus on a justice system that moves from punitive talkback radio knee-jerks to a responsible corrections policy that is built on promoting social wellbeing.”

Ms Sykes says with National, Labour and the Maori party all having followed policies that have ruined the economy they clearly would like to run an election based on law and order issues but here as much as anywhere they are on shaky ground.

Ms Sykes says while the rest of the world has been moving away from imprisonment this government has been locking up more and more people having to resort to inhumane double bunking, putting human beings in containers, and building more prisons, all at huge cost.

“The fact they want to do it in a way that their private sector mates can benefit by running and owning the prisons rubs salt into the wound especially when those mates are foreign companies benefitting from the misery of New Zealanders many of whom are tangata whenua.”

Ms Sykes says privatisation of misery of this kind must cease.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Why is the NZ Treasury preparing state energy companies for privatisation before a mandate is given...

John Key at his victory speech at SKYCITY, Auc...Image via Wikipedia

  Prime Minister John Key keeps saying publicly-owned power companies won't be sold unless National gets a mandate at the general election.

However, 'BusinessDay', May 26, claimed  that theTreasury had already set up a group "to do the background work on the privatisation programme".

Last month, the Government reportedly  made 18 new appointments throughout 12 state-owned enterprises, aimed at firing up their boardrooms. They included appointing Keith Tempest, former chief executive of TrustPower (provider of some of the highest- priced electricity) to the board of TransPower.

Then the Treasury called for tenders for a project manager and adviser, and will soon establish an expert advisory panel.

Apparently this is being done in order to enable the sell-down "as soon as possible" after the election.

The Government doesn't have a mandate to sell any SOEs. Is the Treasury a law unto itself? Or is this outright arrogance on the part of Mr Key?

The National Party government is not only behaving arrogantly, it is acting illegally.  The smell of fascism is permeating the political scene in the run-up to the elections in New Zealand.

If New Zealanders were aware of what they are planning would they want to vote for them?

New Zealanders are actually too busy watching the Rugby World Cup at present than worrying about the political machinations  of this National Party government. Smile, wave, mince, smile, wave,  that's the style of Prime Minister John Key.







Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

NZ Criminal Procedures Bill passes second reading...

New Zealand Labour MPs Charles Chauvel, Annett...Image via Wikipedia





NZ Criminal Procedures Bill passes second reading

Just because you may be famous will be no guarantee of getting name suppression if law changes before Parliament are passed.


Just because you may be famous will be no guarantee of getting name suppression if law changes before Parliament are passed.

Rules around suppression are being tightened in the Criminal Procedures Bill which has passed its second reading in Parliament by 110 votes to 11.

Justice Minister Simon Power says the Bill contains measures that will help address name suppression concerns around so-called celebrities.

"By providing that there is no presumption of extreme hardship solely on the ground that the defendant is well known or famous or think they are."

Labour MP Charles Chauvel is endorsing the Government's decision to loosen its original restrictions around access to jury trials, and also its change of heart on making inroads into a defendant's right to silence.

He says it's an ancient principle of our justice system that the prosecution's job is to prove an offence.

"The State has enormous resources which it can deploy in the detection and punishment of alleged offences, and when it does so there has to be some balancing."

Charles Chauvel says the right to silence is one of the most important of those.

The legislation will have its third and final reading after the election.
Subscribe to NZCity's Politics articles Acknowledgements: © 2011 NZCity, NewsTalkZB
Enhanced by Zemanta