Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts

Friday, February 25, 2011

Welfare reform is disgraceful...

Sue Bradford, former NZ Green Party MPImage via Wikipedia

Welfare reform report is 'disgraceful'...


Beneficiaries advocate Sue Bradford has called a report suggesting at least 100,000 people on welfare benefits be forced back to work within 10 years a "disgraceful, dirty attack" on beneficiaries.

The Welfare Working Group's final report was released yesterday, giving the Government 43 recommendations to reform the welfare system.

The report focuses on lowering the number of people on welfare benefits from about 360,000 to 260,000 within 10 years by setting work obligations and harsh penalties if people do not comply.

Welfare Working Group chairwoman Paula Rebstock said she was confident the reform package would have a positive impact on people, their families and the wider community.

But Ms Bradford said the report was a "disgraceful, dirty attack" on welfare recipients, and the Government should throw it in the rubbish.

"I'm begging to think they've been looking to Nazi Germany for inspiration, with their underpinning 'work makes free' philosophy, attempted eugenic control of a portion of the population, and its potential racist implications for Maori."

The former Green MP said the new system would subject beneficiaries to punitive work testing and sanctioning, including the sick, injured and disabled.

One of the many recommendations in the report was merging all existing categories of benefits, including the sickness and invalid benefits, into a single Jobseeker Support payment.

The additional costs of other benefits would be converted into supplementary payments, meaning overall payments would not be cut.

The group also suggested solo parents work 20 hours per week when their youngest child reached three years old.

Solo parents would receive assistance aimed at covering the costs of childcare for the first six months, or two years of study.

The Government has already ruled out a radical recommendation to send mums who have a subsequent child while on welfare back to work when the child turned 14 weeks.

Recipients who do not meet their obligations would get a 25 percent payment cut for the first failure; 50 percent for the second; 100 percent for the third; and a 13-week stand-down for a fourth or any subsequent failure.

The establishment of a single crown agency, Employment and Support New Zealand, which would administer the system, was also recommended.

Ms Rebstock said the proposed changes would reduce the number of people looking for work from 37 percent to 77 percent, and the Government's forward liability would go from $47 billion to $34b by 2021.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei said the changes would spell a disaster for vulnerable children.

"Forcing solo parents to work when their youngest child is three and cutting off their benefit if they don't comply will punish children and entrench the growing gap between those who have the most and those who need the most."

Ms Turei said work testing people with chronic illness, and moving to a single benefit were equally unacceptable.

Unicef NZ said it was concerned small children may not receive the best care and be at risk of inadequate childcare arrangements when parents are forced to work.

Unicef NZ executive director Dennis McKinlay said he hoped the Government would follow through with its commitment to ensure no child was placed at risk.

The Public Service Association (PSA) said the proposal to create a new crown entity to look after welfare was a return to the failed model set up in the 1990s.

"Work and Income New Zealand (Winz) was a byword for corporate excess and lack of direction," national secretary Brenda Pilott.

"If we've learnt one thing from the failed state sector reforms of the 1990s it's that policy and operations have to work closely together."

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett said the Government would consider the report.

"This will take time and we'll keep talking to New Zealanders about the kind of welfare system they want, that is fair and effective."

She said the 2021 target sounded ambitious, but other recommendations were not extreme.


Acknowledgements: National Business Review

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Key's speech more about politics than governing...

David Cunliffe, Charles Chauve (politician), A...Image via Wikipedia


Key's speech more politics than governing...



A politics lecturer thinks John Key's statement to Parliament yesterday was short on detail and more about politics than governing.


John Key's speech outlining the government's plans for the year is being described as more politics than governing.

Otago University's lecturer in politics Dr Bryce Edwards says the speech was short on detail.

"This is really directional stuff, it's the Prime Minister standing up trying to look visionary, trying to show the public that this Government is going somewhere, but for anyone looking for more substance they would've been left wondering quite a bit," he told Newstalk ZB.

He says it's more about positioning the government to protect it from attacks in the coming election campaigns.

"You can see this in terms of quite a strong approach towards children in need, vulnerable children," he says. "Most of this is mainly rhetoric but it's trying to take off some of the heat that they might be expecting from Labour in the campaign."

But former National Party president Michelle Boag told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking this morning that they're not ideas designed to win an election.

"Our long term strategies which have to be addressed for the sake of New Zealand's sustainability as an economically well off nation."

She says John Key has identified what needs to be done in the welfare sector.

"It has been shown over many decades throwing money at it does not fix the problem because we're no better off for all the money that's been thrown at it."

Labour Party president Mike Williams thinks Mr Key is putting a gun to the heads of state housing tenants.

"The vast majority of statehouse tenants, believe it or not, don't bother to vote and when they get off their backsides and do vote, they don't vote National as happened in 2005." he told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking. "I think that's a mistake Labour can work on."

He says if he was John Key, he'd fire his speech writers.

"There's no poetry, there's no passion, there's no sense of humour, there's no sens of history."

Mr Williams says John Key's been saying the same things for two year, but nothing's really happened.

Meanwhile Labour MP Grant Robertson says shuffling the chairs around the deck of the public service will do nothing to boost our economy or create jobs.

He says there are lots of rumours going around about restructuring in various departments.

"Everybody wants a more efficient public sector that's responsive to the community needs," he says. "That involves actually sitting down with public servants and working out how we can help them to do their jobs better."

"Just reorganising causes more disruption and more difficulty for people in their jobs."

Grant Robertson says that does nothing to make the public service better for everyone.



Acknowledgements: © 2011 NZCity, NewsTalkZB


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 7, 2011

Taita women earn reprieve from Housing New Zealand stupidity...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - APRIL 02:  New Zealand...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Lower Hutt women win reprieve from eviction therough the stupidity of Housing New Zealand...

Three Lower Hutt women given 24 hours to vacate their homes by Housing New Zealand on Monday have won a reprieve.

Robyn Winther, Huia Tamaka and Billy Taylor were first issued with 90-day eviction notices in March 2009.

Notices mistakenly attached to the orders described the women as partners of gang members who were facing charges of burglary or intimidation, which were later dropped.

The women claimed Housing New Zealand acted unlawfully by terminating the tenancies in the suburb of Taita and in doing so breached the Bill of Rights.

The Tenancy Tribunal upheld the eviction notices, but the women appealed to the District Court, the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which dismissed their appeal in December last year.

Earlier, bailiffs with a police escort served them with notices to leave within 24 hours or be forcibly evicted.

However, on Monday afternoon they were granted an interim injunction, pending the full hearing of their case by the Human Rights Review Tribunal.

KR says:
The women actually live in the Pomare community of North Taita a  suburb in Lower Hutt city and have only survived through the stupidity of Housing New Zealand staff. The so-called gang members were not tenants of the properties and as a consequence the women involved were not treated fairly under the 'law'. They are entitled to be protected under the Bill of Rights. That shows how stupid this government is as well. And the 'mincing'  PM John Key as well. This is the stupid sort of things being experienced in the liberal conservative regime of New Zealand.

Acknowledgements: © 2011, Radio New Zealand

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Job cutbacks at Tertiary Education Commission in NZ described as shocking...

Association of Staff in Tertiary EducationImage via WikipediaThe number of jobs to be scrapped at the Tertiary Education Commission in New Zealand have been described as shocking by the Public Service  Association. The Government's policy is to cap public service jobs, not to slash  numbers. So what the hell is going on here?

A review carried out by private consultants Deloite,  who administer funding for tertiary education, have claimed the commission is hindered  by its structure and lack of strategic capability. It is after all a public service.

While it proposes to create 39 new jobs, it proposes to slash 80 of the existing jobs at the TEC.

The PSA national secretary, Brenda Pilott, says staff are shocked at the size of the cuts and fear their  inability to maintain the workload if the cuts go ahead, which they undoubtably will.

This may be a deliberate tactic to enable further cutbacks in future.

This Government has no credibility at all!


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Hobbit films will be made in NZ - but at what cost to this country?

Warner BrosImage via Wikipedia



The Hobbit films are to be made in New Zealand - but at what cost to New Zealand?



Prime Minister John Key made the announcement on Wednesday night, following two days of talks with Warner Bros executives in Wellington.



Mr Key said an agreement had been reached with the US studio which is financing the two films. They will be directed by Sir Peter Jackson.



The Government says it will introduce legislation in Parliament on Thursday to clarify the employment situation of independent contractors and employees as it relates to the film production industry in New Zealand.  Now NZ legislation is to be influenced from outside NZ. Will China be next to influence change in other areas?



Warner Bros had warned its concerns over industrial relations issues in New Zealand could see it move the project to another country.



"The industrial issues that have arisen over the past several weeks have highlighted a significant set of concerns for the way in which the international film industry operates," Mr Key said.



"We will be moving to ensure that New Zealand law in this area is settled to give film producers like Warner Bros the confidence they need to produce their films in this country."



Mr Key confirmed the Government will widen the qualifying criteria for its Large Budget Screen Production Fund "to improve New Zealand's competitiveness as a film destination for large budget films."



The Hobbit films will receive an extra tax rebate of $US7.5 million each, depending on box office takings, he said.



The Government will also offset $US10 million of the films' promotion by Warner Bros as part of a strategic partnership to publicise New Zealand.



One of the films will have its world premiere in New Zealand.


KR says:


Peter Jackson's credibilty has been changed for ever in this country. Since  I have lost all  respect for him I will refuse to refer him as Sir, in much the same way as I refuse to refer to Roger Douglas as Sir, too! Jackson's claims that a 'gun was held to his head' is exaggerated claptrap.

There is no doubting Jackson's brilliance as a film-maker, but he has nailed his political affiliation to the rightwing National Party mast. The National Government won't be in power for too  much longer Mr Jackson; it could well be  next year as there are signs that the tide is going out for them. Really, it all depends on Phil Goff's performance as opposition leader in coming months. He would  never change legislation as Key has done to allow employees to become contractors in a New Zealand context. That is something I'm certain about.







Acknowledgements: © 2010, Radio New Zealand


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 3, 2010

Foreshore and seabed bill around the corner...

Māori PartyImage via Wikipedia





Foreshore and seabed bill around the corner?



The Government have made good progress on a bill designed to repel the existing law and guarantee access to the foreshore and seabed for all New Zealanders.


Prime Minister John Key says New Zealanders will find out what rights they have to the foreshore and seabed next week.



The Government has been seeking feedback on a proposal to repeal the existing law and replace it with a public domain regime where no one would own the foreshore and seabed.



Mr Key says the bill will likely be introduced into Parliament next week.



He says good progress has been made with the bill, and when it's released it will guarantee access to the foreshore and seabed for all New Zealanders.


Key can say what he likes. Will Maori support him? The Maori Party was formed because greedy radical Maori want it for themselves. They don't seem to understand they are not the owners of this land, just the caretakers of their few hectares.  Maori are not indigenous to NZ anyway; their ancestors came from East Polynesia. Nobody can own the land below the high-tide mark anyway!








Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The economy, housing, jobs and a clueless PM John Key and his rusty lock administration...

Unemployed people in front of a workhouse in L...Image via WikipediaThe  economy, housing, jobs - and a clueless PM John Key and his rusty lock administration...


My guest this week:  Frank Macskasy


In the last seven days a triple-conjunction of political portents has publicly demonstrated just how bankrupt of imagination and policy this current government truly is. The lack of direction and paucity of creative ideas is breath-taking. A “caretaker-government” would be a polite euphemism in this context.



JOBLESS



Unemployment rose 19,000 during the June quarter to 159,000 – a rise from 6% to 6.8%. There are over quarter of a million jobless Kiwis (the unemployed plus those who have given up actively looking for a job) and another 100,000 who want more hours than they can get. The effects of the Recession are still being felt, and is taking its toll amongst workers and their families.



Social Welfare Minister Paula Bennett’s response?



”No-one wants to see a jump in unemployment. And I think that we have got to put it in perspective – where it’s 7.1 per cent in December last year and now it’s 6.8…We’d sort of see it as an evening out now.”



This government’s response thus far to our growing unemployment? That would be… the cycleway.



Total number employed under this project: a staggering… 70.



Instead of addressing this worsening situation, this government has spent tax dollars on a “working group”, led by former Commerce Commission head Paula Rebstock.



It’s conclusion? “Most people on a benefit have little or no focus on paid work, with a growing number “locked into” the system for years. ” And, according to Ms Rebstock, “we have concluded the current benefit system ignores the importance of paid work to the well-being of New Zealanders,”



When in doubt; when there’s nowhere left to turn; and when embarrassed by lengthening dole queues – reset National Government Default Setting #1: blame it on the “dole bludging beneficiaries and solo-mums”.



In the last twenty years, National has found iself taking office during two full-blown recessions; 1990 and 2008. Their knee-jerk reaction on both occasions was/is attack the beneficiaries. (Most of us remember the cruelty of Ruth Richardson’s “Mother of all budgets”.) True to form, this government attacks those New Zealanders who – until a couple of years ago – were employed in enterprises from Kaitaia to Bluff; earning money to feed their families; and not foreseeing that, because of events in Wall Street, they would soon be losing their jobs. I struggle to understand how workers in New Zealand were able to effect the collapse of Lehmann Bros on September 15, 2008, thereby sparking the worst recession since the Depression of the 1930s. And by causing that Recession, destroying their own jobs in some Lemming-like pursuit of a dole-funded Nirvana.



The Rebstock report is not a re-analysis of how social welfare works in this country. Instead it is little more than a none-too-subtle attempt at blaming beneficiaries for this current government’s laziness and ineptitude in addressing increasing growing numbers of unemployed.



Remember that prior to the Recession, our unemployment rate was a mere 3.9%. And while no one is blaming National for the Recession that nearly doubled that figure over two years – they are responsible for their abysmal response to it.



Remember: we have 357,000 people who are looking for work.



This government is sitting on it’s collective, well-padded backside; on equally well-padded ministerial seats; fiddling with dubious reports whilst our economy burns to the ground.



Which brings us to…



HOMELESS



Yet another government quango, established by Housing Minister Phil Heatley, has complained that “22,000, or 32 per cent of Housing New Zealand tenants, had been in the same state houses for at least 10 years.” They were evidently portrayed as taking up room – room required by just over 10,000 people on Housing NZ’s waiting lists;



Current Housing NZ waiting list:



As at 31 July 2010 there were 10,153 people on the waiting list. Of this:



* 334 were A priority (severe housing need)

* 4,160 were B priority (significant housing need)

* 3,093 were C priority (moderate housing need)

* 2,566 were D priority (lower level housing need)



Ten thousand-plus people on a waiting list. What does the government do? What policy does it embark on? The following is a multi-choice option:



A. Build more houses?



B. Criticise New Zealanders for daring to live long-term in their homes?



It is with considerable unease that I note that Housing Minister Phil Heatley (who has his accommodation paid for by the taxpayer) said, “We want to ensure this significant asset is utilised to the best effect. We also want the system to be fairer and to work better for those families most in need.”



This government’s idea of “fairness” seems predicated on the suggestion that one family is booted out, to allow another to take up residence.



By no stretch of the imagination can such a policy be even remotely seen as imaginative or creative. Or fair.



It is an undeniable fact that there are many families in dire need of decent, affordable, accommodation. But rather than evicting families, and uprooting them from their communities (which in itself would create even more dire social problems), it strikes me that this government has alternatives it has not bothered to consider…



CLUELESS



Fact #1: we have 255,000 jobless fellow New Zealanders, looking for work and a further 100,000 needing more work.



Fact #2: we require several thousand new NZ Housing units (commonly referred to as “homes”) for people in need.



Fact #3: the economic recovery has been uneven, and has mainly benefited exports such as dairying and unprocessed logs. The rest of the economy has not picked up – evidenced by the sharp rise in unemployment. Indeed, ANZ New Zealand chief executive officer Jenny Fagg said that “the New Zealand economy has stabilised in a number of areas although the recovery is somewhat uneven at this early stage. There are signs of a lift in business conditions although growth remains subdued.”



Taken in conjunction, the three facts above would seem to point to an obvious conclusion. The answer is not to bash beneficiaries for daring to accept tax-payer support in feeding themselves and their families. The answer is not to evict families from their state homes. Nor is the answer to guilt-trip solo-mothers or those with disabilities who haven’t a hope in hell in competing with 159,000 other unemployed people to scramble for non-existent jobs.



The answer is to utilise the resources we have and by doing so, give people the opportunity to find work.



In case I need to spell it out to this clueless government: build more bloody houses!



The flow-on effects of a crash building-programme to build five thousand new state houses would create thousands of new jobs – not just 70. There would be a demand for architects; builders; electricians; plasterers; roofers; drainlayers; glaziers; tilers; apprentices; and other tradespeople; raw materials purchased from building retailers; additional staff at each retail outlet; transport operators; increased demand from the timber industry, creating new jobs in forestry; and support businesses every step of the way. Each tradesperson; truckie; forestry worker would take home a wage. That wage would be spent at local supermarkets, which would then have to hire one or two extra staff-members as well as purchase more stock. Even the companies that rent out jumbo-bins to cart away the detritus from building sites would find their turn-over increasing. Or the local pie-shop that would sell food to nearby building-sites. That is what flow-on is.



The government would recoup much of the outlay for the building programme by way of GST, PAYE, ACC, and provisional tax receipts; rent collected from the new homes; and less spent on unemployment benefits.



This is the sort of bold initiative we require from a government with any claim to having a vision.



Instead, we are seeing a cruel bullying and calculated persecution of those at the bottom of the heap.



If this is the best that National can offer us, then it is simply not good enough. We deserve better than a caretaker government.



Acknowledgements:  Frank Macskasy


http://peter-petterson.blogspot.com/    DOWN BY THE HUTTRIVER

http://anzacbloggersunite.blog.co.uk/   ANZAC BLOGGERS UNITE


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, July 19, 2010

John key should ask Helen Clark for advice because he is stuffing up ENZED...

UNDP Ms. Helen Clark meeting with New Zealand ...Image via Wikipedia
A story from Hutts Blogesphere:


John Key wants to jump into bed with the Chinese and introduce alien policies here...

Image via WikipediaIs the John Key led National government a fascist administration? Why are they attacking mostly young Kiwi workers with their 90 day trials for new workers and now demanding a doctor's note for the first day off work sick. I understand this is the way things have been done in the US; but the US is hardly a leader in social and workplace policies, are they? Yet New Zealand's rightwing pollies rush there to learn how to kick workers in the guts.



NZ once led the world in social policies and was a world leader in labour relations too. Now it is like a little snot-nosed kid in the world of adults. John key and his rusty lock excuse for an administration will probably be introducing Chinese policies into New Zealand. This dimwit politician want's Kiwis to learn Mandarin. Why would we? There may well be some benefit for those dealing direct with China, but for the majority there is no need - the Chinese can learn English properly if they want to deal with us.



John Key wants to jump into bed with the Chinese and introduce alien policies. Is he looking for a job after poiltics? Helen Clark got a job at the United Nations - is ranked number three there! John Key is not fit to clean Ms Clark's shoes!


He should ask Helen Clark for advice because he is stuffing up ENZED!


http://huttsblogesphere.blogspot.com/

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, June 27, 2010

The National Government is testing the water to consider asset sales...

Clean drinking water...not self-evident for ev...Image via Wikipedia
Home > News > Politics





The National Government is testing the water, so to speak, to consider asset sales...


Public's view on partial privatisation of state assets to be assessed; Labour claims Nats testing water for future sale of SOEs; of course, what would you expect?



Labour is suspicious of work being done to assess the public's view on partial privatisation of state assets.



The Crown Ownership Monitoring Unit is undertaking the task at the request of Treasury.



Labour Party Finance spokesman David Cunliffe claims the Government's motivations are clear. He says it is obvious National intends privatising state assets if it is re-elected.



Mr Cunliffe says the Monitoring Unit's actions are a pre-cursor to that.



I wonder if NZ Post and Kiwi Bank are both being considered?








Acknowledgements: © 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 14, 2010

PM gives Maori Party ultimatum - like it or lump it - Bwana Key has spoken...

Maori Party logoImage via Wikipedia






PM gives Maori Party ultimatum - like it or lump it...





Maori Party given an ultimatum by PM John Key - accept the proposals for a new Foreshore and Seabed Act or the staus quo remains


The Government is moving closer to finalising its plan for replacing the controversial 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act.



The issue was discussed at Cabinet yesterday.



John Key has laid things on the line for the Maori Party. He says if it does not agree to his proposals to replace the foreshore and seabed act, the 2004 act will stay the same until a later government can find a resolution..



The Prime Minister believes negotiations are nearly complete. He says while in theory he may get approval for the government's plans from other parties, he is insisting he has to have Maori Party support.



There are three conditions for the Maori Party - that the 2004 act is repealed, Maori customary rights are restored and iwi are given the right to go to court or negotiate with the government directly over the foreshore and seabed.


So there Maori Party, like it or lump it - Bwana Key has spoken!



Acknowlegements. © 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB




Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Sports investment will not create significant numbers of jobs here in NZ...

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via Wikipedia
John Key and the National Government is to invest more millions into sport. Great ! I would have to support the basic idea. but what is he really trying to achieve?

This government's inane philosophy has destroyed thousands of public service jobs. How is sport going to create significant numbers of jobs. Its sports policy appears to be about putting money into elite sport. This is not the priority at present.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, May 31, 2010

Is Cabinet Minister Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - AUGUST 07:  Minister f...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Is Cabinet Minister  Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights?



A request for a cash settlement to resolve a privacy complaint against Cabinet minister Paula Bennett suggests the politician could have been at fault, a top privacy lawyer says.



John Edwards, who has been a privacy lawyer for 20 years and helped set up the Privacy Commissioner's Office in 1993, says Ms Bennett may have breached privacy rights again in disclosing details of the request.



Ms Bennett revealed the contents of a letter she received from the commissioner's office. In the letter, solo mother Natasha Fuller asked for a $15,000 cash settlement and an apology for the hurt and humiliation she had suffered.



Is Paula Bennett guilty of breaching privacy rights? Here is the latest selection of Your Views:


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

A foolish prime minister and his cannibal joke...

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via Wikipedia




PM makes Tuhoe cannibal joke - just a foolish man...




Prime Minister John Key has joked about Tuhoe being cannibals during a speech to a tourism audience in Auckland.



Mr Key angered Tuhoe this week when he ruled out the return of the Urewera National Park as part of the iwi's proposed treaty settlement.



The row has dogged the Prime Minister all week, with Tuhoe accusing him of betrayal and Maori Party Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia accusing the Government of acting in bad faith.



In a speech on Thursday to about 200 people from the tourism sector, Mr Key alluded to the dispute in a joke.



"The good news is that I was having dinner with Ngati Porou as opposed to their neighbouring iwi, which is Tuhoe, in which case I would have been dinner," he said, "which wouldn't have been quite so attractive."



Asked about the comment after his speech, Mr Key said he was sure Tuhoe will get the joke, but Tuhoe negotiator Tamati Kruger says it was in poor taste, and that the relationship between the iwi and Mr Key is getting worse each day.



"I'm just astounded that the Prime Minister can make light of what we regard as a very, very serious situation regarding ... our future relationships with the Crown.



"I don't think it's becoming at all of a Prime Minister."



Tamati Kruger says Tuhoe is still waiting for contact from the Crown, following John Key's decision to rule out the return of Te Urewera.



The Maori Party MP for Waiariki, which includes Tuhoe country, says the joke is unfortunate.



"Well the first thing to say is, it's probably correct, and the second thing is (it's) probably not wise in the current climate," says Te Ururoa Flavell.



Mr Flavell says Mr Key is generally a happy-go-lucky person and uses humour in a good way, but he's underestimating the treaty discussions with Tuhoe by treating it as a joke.



The Prime Minister has defended the Government's decision on the Urewera National Park, saying vesting it in the iwi would be a step too far for most New Zealanders.


The fact of the matter is John Key is a fool and not a prime minister's backside!

Acknowledgements: Radio NZ



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, May 3, 2010

But the bad news is...Key came home...

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via Wikipedia
So New Zealand Prime Minister John Key made a secret flying visit to meet the Kiwi SAS contingent in Afghanistan. He says he sent them, so should visit them. Big deal!

But the bad news is...Key came home!

Key with his stupid boyish  grin, has long lost any credibility, as has his rightwing government. They still top the polls. But NZ has a high marijuana usage anyway; so its not really surprising.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Is John key a financial wizard - is the Pope a protestant...

John Key, leader of the New Zealand National PartyImage via Wikipedia
John Key is considered a financial wizard because of previous employment, but is he? Is the Pope a protestant?








Since stopping contributions to the Cullen NZ Super Fund, National has cost the country's taxpayers $30 million dollars.





If full contributions had been maintained, the fund would have earned $50 million dollars more, calculations have determined. Even taking extra costs involved, the fund would have earned another $1 million dollars a week for the last 8 mths.







The Government paid in $250 million dollars, instead of the expected $15.5 billion dollars. They claim no further payments will be made until the budget is in surplus. The Treasury estimates it will be 2020 before this occurs.







This is financial mismanagement to go with the total mismanagement of the country by these so-called experts. they couldn't be trusted with the management of the local kindergarten. John and Bill: Hold an early election to prove you know what you are doing. Prove your credentials are sound? Yeah right!


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Foreshore and Seabed attitudes hardening. Really?...

Māori PartyImage via Wikipedia





Foreshore and Seabed attitudes hardening.  Really?


"Hone Harawira, Maori Party MP, says proposed customary rights which are determined by Crown are hardly what Maori want.



Maori attitudes towards the Government's foreshore and seabed proposals may be hardening if feedback given to Maori Party MP Hone Harawira is anything to go by.



The major elements of proposals being discussed include vesting the zone as a public domain and allowing Maori to go through the courts to establish customary title.



Last month Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples spoke positively about how customary title could work for and potentially be accepted by, iwi.



"If they get customary title basically, they've got the run of the roost over all decision of occupations and control over the beach."



However, MP Hone Harawira, says Maori he has spoken to makes it clear that Maori want property title resolved in the final legislation.



"As long as those customary rights can be determined by the Crown and extinguished by the Crown, then they are hardly the customary rights that Maori want anywhere in the country."



Consultation on the foreshore and seabed proposals is due to finish at the end of this month."



KR's Opinion:





The question that should be asked is: Which Maori attitudes are hardening?  Nobody should own land below the high water mark. The majority of Maori live away from their home maraes and wouldn't be regularly involved in their affairs. It is the Maori Party, which has a minority of the total Maori vote, that is pushing the Foreshore and Seabed Act change. Maori do not have the legal right to ownership of the F&S. Maori are not indigenous to New Zealand; they are the first immigrants to this country. Maori are entitled to continued customary usage and perhaps a role as guardian and caretaker of the lands therein. Non-Maori are also legally entitled to access to the beaches and coasts that they have enjoyed since 1840 as well.

It is the State not the so-called Crown,  that should own and mange the Foreshore and Seabed. The public domain is a legally wishy washy sort of title for the land below the high water mark in my opinion.







Acknowledgements: © 2010 NZCity, NewsTalkZB




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]