Sunday, March 4, 2012

Key putting pressure on Australia? What a joke...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 30:  John Key,...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
New Zealand prime minister John keywas  putting pressure on Australia to change a social security law relating to New Zealanders living in Australia. All very fine of course, but this aggressive stance was made before the NZ elections. What has Key said since the elections? Sweet fanny adams,  squat, zilch, not a bloody thing, to use a good antipidean adjective! All talk and no action made Johny  Key a boring fellow!

http://anzacbloggersunite.blog.co.uk/2011/06/21/nz-pm-john-key-putting-pressure-on-australia-to-change-a-social-security-law-relating-to-new-zealanders-in-australia-11350052/
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Dams could be sold under partial privatisation

English: Official photo of Russel Norman, Co-l...
Image via Wikipedia
 
The Government's plans to retain 51 percent of our state-owned enterprises does not guarantee individual strategic assets, like our dams, will not fall 100 percent into foreign private control, the Green Party said today.

Treasury advised the Finance and Expenditure Committee today that partially privatised state-owned energy companies should be managed in a strictly commercial way and wouldn't rule out the possibility that individual assets could fall into foreign ownership.
If it makes commercial sense to sell a dam or two — they’re gone.

"Shareholding Ministers will manage their 51 percent shareholding according to 'best commercial practice' rather than what is in the best public interest. If it makes commercial sense to sell a dam or two — they're gone," said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman.

"Holding 51 percent of an energy company will not, by itself, guarantee that individual assets remain in New Zealand control.

"Under the Government's privatisation plans, if Mighty River Power is offered a commercially attractive bid for their Waikato River dams from an Australian or Chinese investor, the Crown's directors on the board will be obligated to act in the best commercial interest of the company and possibly sell those dams.

"The Government's partial privatisation plans mean they will be giving up New Zealand's long-term strategic interests for short-term commercial expediency."

The Government previously admitted to Maori in their consultation that, 'Under the Mixed Ownership Model, Ministers' legal powers will be those afforded to shareholders under the Companies Act 1993. In practice, Ministers will look to best commercial practice in how they exercise those powers'.

"The possible loss of individual strategic energy assets under the National Government's plan for privatisation is very real and hasn't been solved," Dr Norman added.

"It's yet another reason why the Government's asset sale programme is plain dumb.

"An alternative plan to selling off the best of our last remaining SOEs is to keep them and refocus their largely domestic operations towards booming renewable energy export markets abroad.

"We can create tens of thousands of new, clean technology jobs here at home if we're smart."


Link to Government's consultation document with Maori (see page 10):
http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/reviews-consultation/mixed-ownership/mom-cons-maori-v3.pdf


The Green Party's alternative plan for our energy SOEs:
http://www.greens.org.nz/greenjobs

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 23, 2012

No compo for David Bain says juror - who may be in contempt..

English: David Bain after he was proven innocent
Image via Wikipedia
English: Poster for the play Contempt of Court...
Image via Wikipedia


A law expert believes the Bain juror who's written to the Justice Minister is bordering on contempt of court.
It's reported a juror from David Bain's retrial wrote to the then minister Simon Power urging for him to not grant compensation.
Auckland University's Dr Bill Hodge says it's almost uncharted territory.
"The juror is right on the edge of what we'll call contempt of court. The deliberations, the internal debates in the jury room, they're meant to be a sanctified place that we don't enquire into."
Dr Hodge says it's unlikely this information will affect Justice Ian Binnie's decision over whether compensation will be awarded.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

What is key doing about second class treatment of many Kiwis living in Australia...

English: John Key, leader of the New Zealand N...
Image via Wikipedia
English: Prime Minister of Australia Julia Gil...
Image via Wikipedia
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Living within the donut of social and environmental justice...

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - AUGUST 06: (L-R) Te At...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
A new entry titled 'Living within the donut of social and environmental justice' has been posted to frogblog.

George Monbiot poses an interesting question in the wake of an Oxfam report: Is protecting the environment incompatible with social justice?

The Oxfam report, A Safe and Just Space for Humanity looks at ?Humanity?s challenge in the 21st century is to eradicate poverty and achieve prosperity for all within the means of the planet?s limited natural resources.? It?s a big question especially in New Zealand where dairy intensification, increasing fishing and drilling and mining for resources are presented as necessary steps to deliver growth and lift living standards, to be ?balanced? against environmental degradation.

It?s exactly the line new ?Minister for Everything? Steven Joyce is adopting and best seen in his ?can?ts? opinion piece in the NZ Herald that criticises ?people who in the one breath chant ?more jobs, more jobs? and then in the next breath say ?but don?t do that, or that, or that.?

The report?s author Kate Raworth argues convincingly we can see prosperity, lift people out of poverty within natural limits ? or within the donut, a visual summary for sustainable development. The donut, Raworth points out, is ?The social foundation forms an inner boundary, below which are many dimensions of human deprivation. The environmental ceiling forms an outer boundary, beyond which are many dimensions of environmental degradation. Between the two boundaries lies an area ? shaped like a doughnut ? which represents an environmentally safe and socially just space for humanity to thrive in.?

Where are we at with the donut right now in New Zealand? Around the same time the Seafood Industry Council have produced their own glossy report, The Environmental Cost of New Zealand Food Production, green-washing our fishing industry and again arguing that feeding the world is New Zealand?s economic game. The report however conveniently ignores the significant by-catch impacts pushing some species closer to extinction; clearly outside the donut. The Government is a vocal supporter of more drilling, more mining, and dairy intensification but it?s not about feeding those in poverty, lifting those in energy poverty out nor for Kiwi taxpayers benefit because we know there?s hardly any royalties, hardly any taxes and hardly and jobs and the profits increasingly are flowing offshore. The Government?s economic plans are for a select few despite the altruistic arguments.

Respecting natural limits or saying ?we can?t? sometimes, as Raworth points out, doesn?t have to consign us to maintain poverty, for example:

Providing enough food for the 13% of the world's people who suffer from hunger equates to raising world supplies by just 1%.

Providing electricity to the 19% of people who currently have none would raise global carbon emissions by just 1%.

Bringing everyone above the global absolute poverty line ($1.25 a day) would need just 0.2% of global income.

As I responded to Joyce it?s not about false choices, balance, or ?can?ts?, it?s about ?won?ts?; the Government and many worldwide won?t make common-sense decisions to promote equity or protect the natural environment. We don?t have to ?balance? poverty against wrecking our natural environment ? we can choose renewable energy, clean-tech jobs, increasing conservation, smart transport, and sustainable business, helping people and planet. The Greens know this and that?s why the donut is embedded in our Charter.

Acknowledgements:  frogblog

http://blog.greens.org.nz/index.php?p=22616

------------------------------------------------------



Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

David Bain is not innocent in my book...

Who's Guilty?
Image via Wikipedia
English: David Bain after he was proven innocent
Image via Wikipedia
English: Memorial to the family of David Bain,...
Image via Wikipedia

The PM John key and his Cabinet will have to consider David Bain's claim for compensation. He was found not guilty in his last trial, after a succession of hearings and trials that found him guilty. But being found not guilty does not make David Bain innocent of killing his entire immediate family - parents and siblings.


Joe Karam says people can make up their own minds over his new book on the Bain murders.
'Trial By Ambush: The Prosecutions of David Bain' points the finger at David's father Robin.

Mr Karam says he wrote it to lay out the facts and detail the process that's taken place over the years.
"Pour all that evidence into the melting pot, boil it down and come to your own decision, obviously I say that it confirms very strongly that David Bain not only did not kill his family but he could not have killed them," he told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking.
I look forward to reading this book at the local library - there is no way I would buy a copy that will probably financially benefit David Bain. I'm sorry but I believe that David Bain is not innocent of killing his family. I have friends who believe him innocent, but the last trial lacked all the original witnesses.
If, and this is the longest possible if,  David Bain did not kill his mother and siblings, he definately murdered his father.  So he would be guilty of fratricide? Check my spelling here.

How can John Key find David Bain innocent and award him a million dollars, a similar figure awarded to Allen Arthur Thomas who was innocent of the Crewe murders at Pukekawa decades ago.

Look long and hard at the photo of the Cullen Bain family grave in Dunedin.I want justice done, and claiming David Bain is innocent would not be justice.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Waitangi wisdom revealed...

Waitangi Day
Waitangi Day (Photo credit: digitalsadhu)
Waitangi Day
Waitangi Day (Photo credit: digitalsadhu)
The Act Party?s sole MP John Banks was moaning in the House this week about the ?terrible? protests at Waitangi. The last time he visited Waitangi on Waitangi Day was in 1990 when someone dared to throw a T-shirt at the Queen. Apparently, that makes him an expert. I have been going to Waitangi every year but one since 2001, and I always learn something important about this nation.

There weren?t as many people this year. Some were feisty but unlike the Rugby Sevens, there were not multiple arrests. No one was drunk or rude to no purpose, and there was a level of debate on many political issues which I am yet to hear in Parliament.

For me the most inspiring part of Waitangi this year was a roopu reporting back to the people about their work on constitutional transformation. This roopu consists of some of the most dedicated, experienced and wise leaders of the tino rangatiratanga movement in Aotearoa.

The first speaker Huirangi Waikerepuru, a kaumatua from Taranaki, is a beloved taonga for iwi katoa. He was also the wood work teacher at my high school and we had no idea then of his mana and knowledge. He spoke about the deeper foundations of Maori tikanga and kawa that?s essential for any discussion of Te Tiriti-based transformation.

Professor Makere Mutu spoke about Te Hakaputanga o Nu Tireni and Te Tiriti o Waitangi to set the scene for the constitutional discussion. She brought alive the wisdom of her tipuna in asserting their requirements for the relationships with the manuhiri.

Moana Jackson spoke with his classical eloquence, precision and power about the meaning of lore/law and constitutions and the plan to extend the kawa of the marae to a kawa for the nation through flaxroots korero on questions about ?how should we be governed??. The challenge for Pakeha and tauiwi katoa is what grassroots parallel-process are we capable of running

Mereana Pitman made us laugh but also brought home to us the jewels and gems that come from asking people in the hapu and marae what kind of governance arrangements they believe would benefit themselves and also Aotearoa.

Annette Sykes, whose analysis is of legendary sharpness, brought the focus onto the need to properly resource the process of dialogue with flaxroots people who don?t get to stay in flash hotels.

Veronica Tawhai who is a younger academic/activist inspired me when she spoke about the work on a Waitangi claim about loss of political decision making which was rejected as an issue the Waitangi Tribunal could usefully address.

I was inspired by the oil and mining protestors, the work of Mike Smith and the calm resolute aura of Tame Iti who faces down the court in the next two weeks for supposed ?criminal gang? activity.

I was left with a challenge ? how will Tangata Te Tiriti respond? How will we contribute to these issues in right relationship with tangata whenua? Te Tiriti belongs to all of us and as Kingi Taurua said, ?not to celebrate or to commemorate but to honour?.

http://blog.greens.org.nz/index.php?p=22493

 Acknowledgements:  frogblog / The Greens

Enhanced by Zemanta